Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Figure 2-3. Effect of Periodic Fluid Addition and Fluid Change
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home


   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 

NAVAIR 17-15-50.1
TM 38-301-1
T.O. 33-1-37-1
CGTO 33-1-37-1
Figure 2-3. Effect of Periodic Fluid Addition and Fluid Change
k.  Evaluation Information. Time since new or overhaul must be reported correctly, and the evaluator must
remain alert to detect any inconsistencies in these data. When necessary, the customer must be contacted to
check on the validity of any suspect values that affect the evaluation. The reporting of an incorrect time for the
component may cause the evaluation to request a component removal rather than an oil change or reducing the
sampling interval. It is also important that information on component maintenance be reported and considered in
the evaluation process.
l.  Filter/Screen Checks. Information regarding the examination of filters or screens during routine
equipment servicing can often augment spectrometric analysis. Large particles accumulated on filter screens
may or may not be accompanied by high spectrometric wear-metal indications. Normally, the wearmetals
detected and measured by spectrometric analysis are too small to be trapped on a filter screen. Therefore, visible
particles on the screen and high wear-metal content (spectrometric) may be detected independently. When large
metal particles are detected in the oil system, either on filters or chip detectors, the source of the metal should be
determined, if possible, or the equipment should be placed on shorter chip detector/filter inspection and/or oil
sampling intervals.
m. Operating Conditions. The mission profile concerns the load factor and manner in which the equipment
is operated. Generally speaking, equipment that operates at high percentages of maximum load at all times, will
show a higher concentration of wearmetals. Extreme operating load factors invite engine and power train
problems. Under normal loads and less demanding conditions, most equipment operates at lower, more stable
wear-metal concentration levels. Equipment operated intermittently may exhibit symptoms associated with
corrosion.
n. Feedback. Operating activity feedback containing maintenance or operating information that may affect
the oil analysis results must be included in the evaluation process.  For example, a sudden increase in
wearmetals may indicate a severe wear condition, but may also indicate that maintenance was performed on the
component since the last sample was taken. Overboosts, overspeeds, overtemps, cylinder or rings replaced,
overtorque, vibration, corrosion found, repair or adjustments on components, color of oil, mission profile
information, compressor stalls, unusual noises from the component and filter/screen and chip detector
inspections are all bits

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business